Acies
New member
Ich hab derzeit wieder auf Papier umgestellt nachdem ich recht viel Staub in der Ansaugung hatte. Vermute das die Dichtung meines Pipercross um den LMM nicht ganz dicht war
.
Übrigens aus dem Swedespeed Forum:
AEM Dryflow vs. OEM
K&N
Wie das Ansprechverhalten aussieht ist jedoch eine andere Sache.Â
Übrigens aus dem Swedespeed Forum:
AEM Dryflow vs. OEM
I did some data logging and he told me my maf sensor readings (kg/hr) were low. Told me to check for boost leaks Etc etc. I knew for a fact my car had 0 leaks. Any ways.....when I did the logging i got anywhere from 892kg/hr to 920ishh. Right on par for my buddies bone stock R. Made me pretty pissed.
For ****s and giggles today, I swapped in my stock filter to see what the flow differences was....with the stock filter I was flowing 1015kg/hr!!!!! Same conditions as the high flow filter!!!! Needless to say my power was restored. It shocked me to see that the stock oem filter flowed 80-100 more kg/hr than the "performance filter"
K&N
Threw on a K&N filter on my buddy's are did some data logging and got a flow rate of 1023kg/h
Threw on an OEM filter on same car 2 mins after first test and got a flow rate of 1026kg/h
Wie das Ansprechverhalten aussieht ist jedoch eine andere Sache.Â